Conflicting signals from federal agencies have prompted some employers to scale back or suspend DEI-related initiatives out of fear that such programs may be considered “illegal.” However, overcorrecting in this direction creates its own set of risks, especially under Title VII, which continues to prohibit discrimination based on race, sex, disability, national origin, age, and other…
Read More
A recent court decision involving Starbucks offers an important lesson for federal contractors navigating today’s DEI scrutiny: even in a politically charged environment, courts still require specific evidence of actual harm — not assumptions, headlines, or generalized allegations. In the case, Missouri’s attorney general sued Starbucks, arguing that the company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives unlawfully advantaged…
Read More
When employers think about discrimination risk, they usually focus on familiar protected categories such as race, sex, ethnicity, age, disability, or religion. But a recent settlement announced by the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) underscores a growing and less understood enforcement area: discrimination against U.S. workers based on citizenship and…
Read More
On Dec. 10, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a federal lawsuit against Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS), alleging unlawful race- and sex-based employment practices embedded in the district’s collective bargaining agreement (CBA). According to the complaint, MPS prioritized teachers who belonged to “underrepresented populations,” set explicit numerical staffing goals for “BIPOC” employees, and…
Read More
PART II — Why Companies Outsource: The Free-Market Realities Shaping the Skilled Labor Crisis The federal push to bring jobs back to the United States cannot be understood in isolation. Employers do not outsource simply to cut corners, they outsource because global economic pressures, labor shortages, and structural educational barriers make it difficult to fill…
Read More
